Procedural Labyrinths and the Injustice of Death: A Critique of Death Penalty Habeas Corpus (Part One)

Clarke, Alan W.

Journal: University of Richmond Law Review

Volume: 29

First Page: 1327

Year: 1995

Bluebook Citation: 29 U. RICH. L. REV. 1327 (1995)

Author: Alan W. Clarke: all 8 publications


Abstract

Habeas corpus was once a broad writ of liberty: it served to give meaning to expanding notions of due process, it forced state judicial systems to obey constitutional commands, and it made effective modern conceptions of fundamental fairness. Although a simple implement of humble origin, U.S. habeas corpus became inextricably interwoven with the substantive rights it enforced. Without a practical remedy, cutting across state boundaries and affording uniform access, the substantive rights themselves lose meaning. A right without remedy is a right without meaning.

Thus, habeas corpus became an important part of the substantive rights that it enforced.

Chat with this journal article using AI

Ask CiteLaw's AI Navigator anything about this journal article, verify citations, and research related authorities. Sign up for CiteLaw free today to get started.