Pride and Prejudice and Proof: Quotidian Factfinding and Rules of Evidence

Cavallaro, Rosanna

Journal: UC Law Journal

Volume: 55

First Page: 697

Year: 2004

Bluebook Citation: 55 UC L.J. 697 (2004)

Author: Rosanna Cavallaro: all 6 publications


Abstract

This Article considers the novel Pride and Prejudice, by Jane Austen, as a work of literature that invites the reader and legal scholar to reflect on the modes of proof we use in our quotidian factfinding, and how they vary from those available to adjudicatory factflnders under existing rules of evidence. In particular, the novel allows those interested in intersections between law and literature to explore the preferencing of live testimony as against hearsay; the use of character or propensity evidence; and the balance between truthseeking and confidentiality that underlies rules of privilege. Sometimes augmenting traditional legal and social science scholarship, sometimes challenging it, this Article examines some literary insights into the validity of those evidentiary rules.

Chat with this journal article using AI

Ask CiteLaw's AI Navigator anything about this journal article, verify citations, and research related authorities. Sign up for CiteLaw free today to get started.