Preserving the Core of Roe: Reflections on Planned Parenthood v. Casey

Linda Wharton, Susan Frietsche & Kathryn Kolbert

Journal: Yale Journal of Law & Feminism

Volume: 18

First Page: 317

Year: 2007

Bluebook Citation: 18 YALE J. L. & FEMINISM 317 (2007)

Author: Linda J. Wharton: all 3 publications


Abstract

In Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania v. Casey, the Supreme Court backed away from affording women the highest level of constitutional protection for the abortion choice, but nonetheless promised to preserve Roe v. Wade's core objectives by instituting the undue burden standard for measuring the constitutionality of restrictions on abortion. In the years following the Casey decision, states and the federal government have added more and more restrictions on women's access to abortion. This Article asks whether Casey's undue burden standard has meaningfully protected a woman's right to an abortion.

Chat with this journal article using AI

Ask CiteLaw's AI Navigator anything about this journal article, verify citations, and research related authorities. Sign up for CiteLaw free today to get started.