Popular Sovereignty and Its Limits: Lessons for a Constitutional Convention in California

Grodin, Joseph R.

Journal: Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review

Volume: 44

First Page: 623

Year: 2011

Bluebook Citation: 44 LOY. L. A. L. REV. 623 (2011)

Author: Joseph R. Grodin: all 31 publications


Abstract

California’s pressing structural problems require changes to the California Constitution that may be difficult to accomplish through the current constitution’s three stated means of reform. In response, coalition reform groups, such as Repair California, have proposed amending the constitution to authorize the calling of a constitutional convention through an initiative measure. This Article focuses on the state, constitutional, and procedural issues that may arise from such a change. Through an analysis of the relevant California Supreme Court decisions since 1911, this Article concludes that there is indeed a principled basis for sustaining the constitutional validity of an initiative measure amending the constitution to permit a constitutional convention called by the people, for authorizing a different method of selecting convention delegates, and for allowing such an initiative to limit the convention’s scope to certain specified subjects.

Chat with this journal article using AI

Ask CiteLaw's AI Navigator anything about this journal article, verify citations, and research related authorities. Sign up for CiteLaw free today to get started.