Polygamy and Same-Sex Marriage: A Response to Calhoun

Rickless, Samuel C.

Journal: San Diego Law Review

Volume: 42

First Page: 1043

Year: 2005

Bluebook Citation: 42 SAN DIEGO L. REV. 1043 (2005)

Author: Samuel C. Rickless: all 7 publications


Abstract

Support for legalizing same-sex marriage can be achieved without supporting the case for polygamy. This article responds to Professor Calhoun by raising objections to Calhoun's three main points. Polygamy does not strengthen the case for same-sex marriage because polygamy has not achieved any cultural significance equaling monogamy. Advocating the state to adopt a pluralistic, contractual approach to marriage overlooks the fact that the liberal state's role is not only to enforce but also to regulate private contracts.

Polygamy is structurally problematic because it exacerbates the crises marriages face. Because same-sex marriages do not suffer from the same structural problems polygamous marriages suffer from, the author concludes that arguments for same-sex marriage can be put forward without supporting polygamy.

Chat with this journal article using AI

Ask CiteLaw's AI Navigator anything about this journal article, verify citations, and research related authorities. Sign up for CiteLaw free today to get started.