PHYSICIANS AND SURGEONS-STATUS OF OSTEOPATHS-LIMITATIONS ON PRACTICE

Reddin, III S.Ed., Daniel W.

Journal: Michigan Law Review

Volume: 47

First Page: 565

Year: 1949

Bluebook Citation: 47 MICH. L. REV. 565 (1949)

Author: Iii S. Ed Daniel W. Reddin: all 2 publications


Abstract

Until recently, the osteopath has generally been given a limited license. The present status of the osteopath is best understood by a comparison with that of the unlimited practitioner. Though most of the statutes have been examined, this comment is based primarily upon those of Illinois, New York, Pennsylvania, Ohio, Michigan, California, Massachusetts and Indiana, which are fairly typical of the rest. These statutes vary widely in their provisions, but for the purposes of discussion, they have been treated in three arbitrary categories: (1) statutes in which the scope of the osteopath's license is considerably narrower than that of the unlimited practitioner; (2) those in which it is somewhat similar to that of the unlimited practitioner; and, (3) those in which it is almost identical with that of the unlimited practitioner.

Chat with this journal article using AI

Ask CiteLaw's AI Navigator anything about this journal article, verify citations, and research related authorities. Sign up for CiteLaw free today to get started.