Patents-Adjudication of Validity in Infringement Cases Where Alternative Grounds for Dismissal Exist

Urick, Walter A.

Journal: Michigan Law Review

Volume: 62

First Page: 135

Year: 1963

Bluebook Citation: 62 MICH. L. REV. 135 (1963)

Author: Walter A. Urick: all 3 publications


Abstract

Petitioner's complaint alleging validity and infringement of his patent was dismissed by the trial court on the ground that petitioner had granted to respondent an implied license or "shop right." On appeal, petitioner claimed, among other things, error in the refusal of the trial court to rule on the questions of validity and infringement of the patent. Respondent moved to strike these claims from petitioner's statement of points on appeal. Held, motion denied. Failure of the trial court to pass on the questions of validity and infringement does not preclude the petitioner from arguing these issues on appeal.

Kierulff v. Metropolitan Stevedore Co., 300 F.2d 614 (9th Cir. 1962).

Chat with this journal article using AI

Ask CiteLaw's AI Navigator anything about this journal article, verify citations, and research related authorities. Sign up for CiteLaw free today to get started.