Party Autonomy and Default Rules Regarding the Choice of Number of Arbitrators

Bantekas, Ilias

Journal: Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution

Volume: 22

First Page: 31

Year: 2020

Bluebook Citation: 22 CARDOZO J. CONFLICT RESOL. 31 (2020)

Author: Ilias Bantekas: all 37 publications


Abstract

This article is divided in two main parts. The first focuses on the party autonomy paradigm in international commercial arbitration. This includes an examination of rules and practices allowing the parties to choose both an even and odd number of arbitrators. The second part looks at the variety of default options, including the appropriate number of arbitrators in multi-party proceedings.

Two smaller sections follow these. The first examines, albeit briefly, the position with respect to truncated tribunals. The second analyzes the appropriate number of arbitrators in the event that the parties choose one or more legal persons as arbitrators, particularly where there is a conflict with the lex arbitri or their chosen institutional rules.

Chat with this journal article using AI

Ask CiteLaw's AI Navigator anything about this journal article, verify citations, and research related authorities. Sign up for CiteLaw free today to get started.