Our Inadequate Attorneys' Lien Statutes—A Suggestion

Stevens, George Neff

Journal: Washington Law Review

Volume: 31

First Page: 1

Year: 1956

Bluebook Citation: 31 WASH. L. REV. 1 (1956)

Author: George Neff Stevens: all 17 publications


Citation analytics

How this journal article sits in the citation network, derived from CiteLaw's graph of published opinions.

Cited
4
Citing decisions
2
Courts citing

Citations by decade

1
3
1970s1980s

Courts citing this journal article

Wash. Ct. App.3
Wash.1
Most recently cited by4
  • 1983Suleiman v. Cantino Wash. Ct. App.
  • 1982Ross v. Scannell Wash.
  • 1982Barney, Cromwell, Weiner & Mendoza v. Kreider Wash. Ct. App.
  • 1970Mahomet v. Hartford Insurance Wash. Ct. App.

Counts reflect decisions in the CiteLaw corpus and may lag very recent opinions.


Abstract

The average attorney has little interest in, nor does he realize the inadequacy of, the attorney's lien laws of his state—until he finds himself personally involved. Yet, a glance at the law reviews and pertinent cases indicates that the organized bar and its individual members should show more than a casual interest in the number and variety of problems arising in this field.

Chat with this journal article using AI

Ask CiteLaw's AI Navigator anything about this journal article, verify citations, and research related authorities. Sign up for CiteLaw free today to get started.