Originalist Sin: The Failure of Originalism to Justify the Unitary Executive Theory

Mohan, Marc

Journal: Lewis & Clark Law Review

Volume: 24

First Page: 1063

Year: 2020

Bluebook Citation: 24 LEWIS & CLARK L. REV. 1063 (2020)

Author: M. P. Ram Mohan: all 5 publications


Abstract

Originalists justify a “unitary executive” theory of presidential powers using the Constitution’s vesting of the executive power in “a President,” as opposed to a council or other multi-member setup. Inspite of this justification’s popularity with originalists, a deeper understanding of prerogative and power, as the Founders understood those key concepts, reveals that the unitary executivetheory cannot be justified through either the original intent orthe original meaning of our founding document. Intheabsence of this grounding, the unitary executive theory is underpinned by modern exigenciesand thereforeloses coherency as an originalist theory.

Chat with this journal article using AI

Ask CiteLaw's AI Navigator anything about this journal article, verify citations, and research related authorities. Sign up for CiteLaw free today to get started.