Online Dispute Resolution: Stinky, Repugnant, or Drab

Condlin, Robert J.

Journal: Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution

Volume: 18

First Page: 717

Year: 2017

Bluebook Citation: 18 CARDOZO J. CONFLICT RESOL. 717 (2017)

Author: Robert J. Condlin: all 15 publications


Citation analytics

How this journal article sits in the citation network, derived from CiteLaw's graph of published opinions.

Cited
1
Citing decision
1
Courts citing
Most recently cited by1
  • 2020People v. Rodriguez CA2/7 Cal. Ct. App.

Counts reflect decisions in the CiteLaw corpus and may lag very recent opinions.


Abstract

In Part II, I provide a brief overview of ODR systems, describing the largest, most well-known, and most sophisticated platforms now in place, to give the reader a sense of the- richness, variety, and benefits of online disputing, and a hint of developments still to come. In Part III, I describe certain legal, political, and moral concerns that have yet to be addressed in the ODR literature, and identify some of the unintended consequences the widespread adoption of ODR systems might produce. And in Part IV, I describe ODR's unfinished agenda, the questions proponents of the process must answer, and the refinements they must make to existing models, if online systems are to satisfy the demands of state-sanctioned, public dispute resolution.

Chat with this journal article using AI

Ask CiteLaw's AI Navigator anything about this journal article, verify citations, and research related authorities. Sign up for CiteLaw free today to get started.