On the Rise of Shareholder Primacy, Signs of Its Fall, and the Return of Managerialism (in the Closet)

Stout, Lynn A.

Journal: Seattle University Law Review

Volume: 36

First Page: 1169

Year: 2013

Bluebook Citation: 36 SEATTLE U. L. REV. 1169 (2013)

Author: Lynn A. Stout: all 19 publications


Abstract

In their 1932 opus "The Modern Corporation and Public Property," Adolf Berle and Gardiner Means famously documented the evolution of a new economic entity—the public corporation. What made the public corporation “public,” of course, was that it had thousands or even hundreds of thousands of shareholders, none of whom owned more than a small fraction of outstanding shares. As a result, the public firm’s shareholders had little individual incentive to pay close attention to what was going on inside the firm, or even to vote. Dispersed shareholders were rationally apathetic.

If they voted at all, they usually voted to approve whatever course of action was recommended by the company’s incumbent directors, including the re-election of the directors themselves.

Chat with this journal article using AI

Ask CiteLaw's AI Navigator anything about this journal article, verify citations, and research related authorities. Sign up for CiteLaw free today to get started.