No-Strike Clauses in the Federal Courts
Stewart, Frank H.
Citation analytics
How this journal article sits in the citation network, derived from CiteLaw's graph of published opinions.
Cited
3
Citing decisions
2
Courts citing
Courts citing this journal article
Most recently cited by3
- 1965Junta de Relaciones del Trabajo de Puerto Rico v. Unión Local 847, Independiente de Santa Isabel P.R.
- 1965Puerto Rico Labor Relations Board v. Unión Local 847, Independiente de Santa Isabel P.R.
- 1962Sinclair Refining Co. v. Atkinson U.S.
Counts reflect decisions in the CiteLaw corpus and may lag very recent opinions.
Abstract
One consideration will support several promises. A promisor may extract more than one promise in return for his single undertaking to do - or not to do. It depends upon his bargaining power. His single undertaking may be so valuable that several promises are necessary to induce him to act, or not to act.
He is privileged to hold out for the best deal. The law does not examine his motives or reduce his demands. And from this arises the common- law principle that one consideration may support several promises.