New Interpretation of the Sherman Act

Eldridge, Clarence E

Journal: Michigan Law Review

Volume: 13

First Page: 113

Year: 1914

Bluebook Citation: 13 MICH. L. REV. 113 (1914)

Author: Clarence E. Eldridge: all 6 publications


Abstract

What has been said in the preceding part of this discussion addresses itself to the proposition that the SHERMAN Act does not mean what the District Court assumed it to mean. Naturally, such a negative discussion must be preliminary to a consideration of the more .comprehensive question "What does the SHERMAN ACT mean?" For, of course, even if the theory of the law upon which the District Court based its judgment was erroneous, still that fact would be of little or no practical importance if any tenable theory of the law were to justify the judgment.

Chat with this journal article using AI

Ask CiteLaw's AI Navigator anything about this journal article, verify citations, and research related authorities. Sign up for CiteLaw free today to get started.