MUNICIPAL CORPORATIONS-CIRCUMVENTING MUNICIPAL DEBT LIMITATIONS

Gricar S.Ed., Joseph F.

Journal: Michigan Law Review

Volume: 48

First Page: 1016

Year: 1950

Bluebook Citation: 48 MICH. L. REV. 1016 (1950)

Author: Joseph F. Gricar S Ed: all 3 publications


Citation analytics

How this journal article sits in the citation network, derived from CiteLaw's graph of published opinions.

Cited
1
Citing decision
1
Courts citing
Most recently cited by1
  • 1969Hall v. Mayor of Baltimore Md.

Counts reflect decisions in the CiteLaw corpus and may lag very recent opinions.


Abstract

Since municipalities are frequently indebted to the permissible extent of the constitutional, statutory, and charter debt limitations, they are constantly seeking methods of finance which avoid the debt limits. Three devices have received judicial sanction. First: Where a separate and distinct. corporation such as a school or drain district has been created it may operate with a separate debt limit over the same territory as the governing municipality. Second: Where the project to be financed is income-producing, the financing bond issue, if made self-liquidating, will not Gome within the debt limitations.

Although incorporated authorities have been extensively used to administer self-liquidating bond issues, the "special fund" doctrine has permitted cities to finance self-liquidating, income-producing projects without farming the job out to an authority. Third: Where a city makes a long term lease for recurring needs, which is not a disguised contract of purchase, only the yearly instalment and not the aggregate rental is considered a debt for purposes of limitations.

Chat with this journal article using AI

Ask CiteLaw's AI Navigator anything about this journal article, verify citations, and research related authorities. Sign up for CiteLaw free today to get started.