Motions Practice before the Board of Immigration Appeals

Hurwitz, Gerald S.

Journal: San Diego Law Review

Volume: 20

First Page: 79

Year: 1982

Bluebook Citation: 20 SAN DIEGO L. REV. 79 (1982)

Author: Gerald S. Hurwitz: all 1 publication


Citation analytics

How this journal article sits in the citation network, derived from CiteLaw's graph of published opinions.

Cited
5
Citing decisions
1
Courts citing

Citations by decade

3
2
1990s2000s
Most recently cited by5
  • 2002VASQUEZ-MUNIZ BIA
  • 2002RAMOS BIA
  • 1998LOPEZ BIA
  • 1997J-J BIA
  • 1992COELHO BIA

Counts reflect decisions in the CiteLaw corpus and may lag very recent opinions.


Abstract

This Article addresses the area of motions practice before the Board of Immigration Appeals, arguing that it is often a complex procedural maze for immigration attorneys. The author examines the intricacies of this procedure, focusing on motions to reopen, motion to reconsider, motions to remand, and motions for stays of deportation. He further examines the often contested issues of the prima facia case, particularly in the context of motions to reopen. In this discussion, the author, an appellate trial lawyer for the Immigration and Naturalization Service, stresses the practical aspects of motions practice in this area.

Chat with this journal article using AI

Ask CiteLaw's AI Navigator anything about this journal article, verify citations, and research related authorities. Sign up for CiteLaw free today to get started.