Models of the Opinion Function of the Attorney General: A Normative, Descriptive, and Historical Prolegomenon

McGinnis, John O.

Journal: Cardozo Law Review

Volume: 15

First Page: 375

Year: 1993

Bluebook Citation: 15 CARDOZO L. REV. 375 (1993)

Author: John O. Mcginnis: all 49 publications


Citation analytics

How this journal article sits in the citation network, derived from CiteLaw's graph of published opinions.

Cited
1
Citing decision
1
Courts citing
Most recently cited by1
  • 2025Campaign for Accountability v. DOJ D.C. Cir.

Counts reflect decisions in the CiteLaw corpus and may lag very recent opinions.


Abstract

The judiciary is not the only branch of government that offers authoritative constructions of the Constitution and other federal laws. Since the beginning of the Republic, the executive branch has made formal pronouncements on constitutional and statutory issues of such a substantial scope and variety that they rival the opinions of the Supreme Court. A public recording of the executive branch's most authoritative legal voice is contained in forty-three volumes of published opinions of the Attorney General and sixteen volumes of published opinions of the Office of Legal Counsel ("OLC")-the office to which the Attorney General now delegates the great majority of his legal opinion writing. These published opinions are only the tip of the iceberg.

In OLC's library sit at least five filing cabinets of largely unpublished opinions dating from the time of OLC's creation in 1932. Biographies of former Attorneys General also report the existence of important unpublished opinions and memoranda of advice from past Attorneys General.

Chat with this journal article using AI

Ask CiteLaw's AI Navigator anything about this journal article, verify citations, and research related authorities. Sign up for CiteLaw free today to get started.