MICHIGAN LEGAL STUDIES: A REVIEW

Rheinstein, Max

Journal: Michigan Law Review

Volume: 41

First Page: 83

Year: 1942

Bluebook Citation: 41 MICH. L. REV. 83 (1942)

Author: Max Rheinstein: all 80 publications


Citation analytics

How this journal article sits in the citation network, derived from CiteLaw's graph of published opinions.

Cited
5
Citing decisions
5
Courts citing

Citations by decade

1
2
2
1940s1950s1960s

Courts citing this journal article

D. Mass.1
Minn.1
N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div.1
Pa.1
Phila. Cty. C.P.1
Most recently cited by5
  • 1966Balts v. Balts Minn.
  • 1966McSwain v. McSwain Pa.
  • 1957Pittman v. Deiter Phila. Cty. C.P.
  • 1957Koplik v. C. P. Trucking Corp. N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div.
  • 1949Gordon v. Parker D. Mass.

Counts reflect decisions in the CiteLaw corpus and may lag very recent opinions.


Abstract

To the knowledge of this reviewer, the relation between printers' wages and the development of the law has not yet been investigated. This problem is by no means so absurd as it may sound. The very principle of stare decisis presupposes the existence of the printing press, a high development of the art of indexing, a well-organized book trade and a price level under which reports and search books are accessible to the members of the legal profession. Treatises and other learned discussions cannot influence legal developments where printing costs are prohibitive.

Yet, the extent to which a legal system is subjected to the critical discussion of textwriters is apt to exert a profound influence upon the methods and contents of the law itself.

Chat with this journal article using AI

Ask CiteLaw's AI Navigator anything about this journal article, verify citations, and research related authorities. Sign up for CiteLaw free today to get started.