Methodological Issues in the Content Analysis of Pornography

Linz, Daniel & Donnerstein, Edward

Journal: University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform

Volume: 21

First Page: 47

Year: 1988

Bluebook Citation: 21 U. MICH. J. L. REFORM 47 (1988)

Author: Edward Donnerstein: all 3 publications


Abstract

No scientifically sound analysis of the content of pornography in the United States as a whole currently exists. Dietz and Sears's article takes us a small step closer to quantifying the contents of pornography. Some of the methods employed in the present study, however, prohibit us from making solid generalizations from the findings reported here to the nationwide pornographic marketplace. Our critique of the article will concentrate first on the methods employed in the study and then on the findings obtained through these methods and the authors' interpretation of these findings.

Chat with this journal article using AI

Ask CiteLaw's AI Navigator anything about this journal article, verify citations, and research related authorities. Sign up for CiteLaw free today to get started.