Medical Malpractice and Compensation in France, Part II: Compensation Based on National Solidarity

Helleringer, Geneviève

Journal: Chicago-Kent Law Review

Volume: 86

First Page: 1125

Year: 2011

Bluebook Citation: 86 CHI.-KENT. L. REV. 1125 (2011)

Author: Genevieve Helleringer: all 3 publications


Abstract

In France, distinctively from the compensation process by insurers of liable professionals, compensation of the victim will in certain cases such as medical hazards, hospital-acquired infections, blood-transfusion infections, result from a compensation scheme similar to that available for victims of terrorism and crimes. It is based on national solidarity and dispensed by the National Fund for Compensation of Medical Accidents (ONIAM). The growing importance of such a compensation scheme may appear to be a double-edged evolution. On one hand, it has improved the status of victims of medical harms; they are increasingly integrally compensated more quickly and under more flexible conditions thanks in particular to the legally established presumptions.

On the other hand, however, compensation by ONIAM, like any other national solidarity fund, may deprive victims of certain procedural safeguards provided by civil liability principles. On a more systemic level, the articulation between national solidarity and civil liability principles raises questions.

Chat with this journal article using AI

Ask CiteLaw's AI Navigator anything about this journal article, verify citations, and research related authorities. Sign up for CiteLaw free today to get started.