Martha Graham, Professor Miller and the "Work For Hire" Doctrine: Undoing the Judicial Bind Created by the Legislature
Kim, Nancy S.
Citation analytics
How this journal article sits in the citation network, derived from CiteLaw's graph of published opinions.
Most recently cited by1
- 2010Molinelli-Freytes v. University of Puerto Rico D.P.R.
Counts reflect decisions in the CiteLaw corpus and may lag very recent opinions.
Abstract
The current work for hire doctrine, as embodied by 17 U.S.C. Sections 101 and 201 and interpreted by the judiciary, provides a default rule of copyright ownership in favor of employers where a work is created by an employee in the scope of employment. In the absence of a written agreement, a finding that an engagement is a work for hire under the statute automatically results in all ownership being vested in the employer. This result often contradicts business norms and the understanding of one or both of the parties. In this Article, the author advocates abolishing the all-or-nothing concept of ownership in favor of a more particularized analysis that emphasizes the expectations of the parties.
This would involve first reversing the current, pro-employer statutory presumption and then analyzing whether, and to what extent, the employer may have a license to the work.