LIMITATION OF ACTIONS - WHAT IS A "WRITTEN" CONTRACT WITHIN STATUTE?

Michigan Law Review

Journal: Michigan Law Review

Volume: 38

First Page: 257

Year: 1939

Bluebook Citation: 38 MICH. L. REV. 257 (1939)


Citation analytics

How this journal article sits in the citation network, derived from CiteLaw's graph of published opinions.

Cited
1
Citing decision
1
Courts citing
Most recently cited by1

Counts reflect decisions in the CiteLaw corpus and may lag very recent opinions.


Abstract

Plaintiff sued on a clause in a deed in which the grantee assumed and agreed to pay a mortgage indebtedness therein specified. This obligation in the deed, being unsigned by the party to be charged, was held to be an unwritten contract by the lower court, and therefore barred by the six-year statute of limitations. Plaintiff appealed. Held, the contract, though unsigned by the party to be charged, was "in writing," and therefore the statutory fifteen-year period of limitations applied.

McCormick v. Taft, (Ohio App. 1938) 22 N. E. (2d) 510.

Chat with this journal article using AI

Ask CiteLaw's AI Navigator anything about this journal article, verify citations, and research related authorities. Sign up for CiteLaw free today to get started.