Legal Aspects of Certain Common Medical Diagnostic Devices

Morse, Howard Newcomb

Journal: Nebraska Law Review

Volume: 46

First Page: 798

Year: 1966

Bluebook Citation: 46 NEB. L. REV. 798 (1966)

Author: Howard Newcomb Morse: all 31 publications


Abstract

I. The Electrocardiogram … A. Admissibility in Evidence of Electrocardiogram … B. Physician Cannot Testify as to Electrocardiogram without Producing It … C. Electrocardiographic Recordings and Interpreting … D. Physician Who Testifies as to Electrocardiogram Does Not Have to Have Made It … E. Value of Electrocardiogram Lies in Plurality for Purpose of Comparison … F. Clinical Correlation II. The Myelogram … A. Attending Physician May Testify as to Pathology Revealed by Myelogram … B. No Introduction in Evidence of Myelogram after Hearing or Trial … C. May Employee be Compelled to Undergo Myelogram? III. The Aortogram … A. Dangers in Aortography … B. Cause of Paraplegia following Aortogram … C. Who Performs Aortography … D. Injuries following Attempted Aortogram … E. Physician’s Negligent Acts in Attempting Aortography IV. The Electroencephalogram … A. Admissibility of Electroencephalograms in Evidence … B. Retroactive Admissibility … C. Foundations Must Be Laid … D. Electroencephalograms as Basis for Expert Opinion … E. Conflicting Interpretations of Electroencephalograms … F. Property in Electroencephalogram

Chat with this journal article using AI

Ask CiteLaw's AI Navigator anything about this journal article, verify citations, and research related authorities. Sign up for CiteLaw free today to get started.