Leaving the Door Ajar: The Supreme Court and Assisted Suicide

Urofsky, Melvin I.

Journal: University of Richmond Law Review

Volume: 32

First Page: 313

Year: 1998

Bluebook Citation: 32 U. RICH. L. REV. 313 (1998)

Author: Melvin I. Urofsky: all 17 publications


Abstract

In June, 1997, the Supreme Court ruled that a constitutional right to assisted suicide exists in neither the Due Process nor the Equal Protection Clauses of the Fourteenth Amendment. But while a federal right does not exist, the Court made it quite clear that the states had ample leeway in which to fashion law on this issue; moreover, the concurring opinions of five Justices strongly implied that, should the states enact legislation that would severely limit end-of-life choices, the Supreme Court would revisit the issue. Far from slamming the door shut on assisted suicide, the Court left it more than a little ajar.

Chat with this journal article using AI

Ask CiteLaw's AI Navigator anything about this journal article, verify citations, and research related authorities. Sign up for CiteLaw free today to get started.