LABOR LAW - NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS ACT - JURISDICTION OF THE NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD

Griffin, John C.

Journal: Michigan Law Review

Volume: 37

First Page: 1328

Year: 1939

Bluebook Citation: 37 MICH. L. REV. 1328 (1939)

Author: John C. Griffin: all 5 publications


Abstract

Respondent, employing about sixty persons, was the sole owner of a garment-tailoring concern in New Jersey. His only business was with the Lee Company, a New York firm, that sold finished goods. There was no financial affiliation between them. The Lee Company purchased the cloth and caused it to be delivered to respondent.

Respondent tailored it and delivered the finished product to a representative of the Lee Company at respondent's plant. This representative sent it back to New York in Lee Company trucks. Title to the cloth remained throughout in the Lee Company. Held, Justices McReynolds and Butler dissenting, and Justice Frankfurter taking no part, that the National Labor Relations Board had jurisdiction of respondent.

National Labor Relations Board v. Fainblatt, (U. S. 1939) 59 S. Ct. 668, reversing (C. C. A. 3d, 1938) 98 F. (2d) 615.

Chat with this journal article using AI

Ask CiteLaw's AI Navigator anything about this journal article, verify citations, and research related authorities. Sign up for CiteLaw free today to get started.