Labor Law - LMRA - Injunctive Relief for Breach of No-Strike Agreement

Shaevsky, Mark

Journal: Michigan Law Review

Volume: 56

First Page: 1205

Year: 1958

Bluebook Citation: 56 MICH. L. REV. 1205 (1958)

Author: Mark Shaevsky: all 5 publications


Abstract

The collective bargaining agreement between the employer and union contained a no-strike provision. While the contract remained in effect, the union sought wage renegotiations. The discussions were unsuccessful and the union called a strike. Claiming a breach of the no-strike clause, the employer requested an injunction against continuance of the peaceful strike.

The district court held that under section 301 of the Labor-Management Relations Act of 1947, which provides that "Suits for violation of contracts between an employer and a labor organization . . . may be brought in any district court ... ," it had authority to enjoin the strike. On appeal, held, reversed. Because the strike constitutes a "labor dispute" under the Norris-LaGuardia Act, section 4 of that act prohibits the court from granting the injunction. Section 301 of the LMRA does not impliedly repeal the anti-injunction provisions of the Norris-LaGuardia Act.

A. H.

Bull Steamship Co. v. Seafarers' International Union of North America, Atlantic and Gulf District, AFL-CIO, (2d Cir. 1957) 250 F. (2d) 326, cert. den. 355 U.S. 932 (1958).

Chat with this journal article using AI

Ask CiteLaw's AI Navigator anything about this journal article, verify citations, and research related authorities. Sign up for CiteLaw free today to get started.