LABOR LAW- COLLECTIVE BARGAINING CONTRACT AS BARRING QUESTIONS CONCERNING REPRESENTATION OF EMPLOYEES

O' Laughlin, Charles J.

Journal: Michigan Law Review

Volume: 40

First Page: 1249

Year: 1942

Bluebook Citation: 40 MICH. L. REV. 1249 (1942)

Author: Charles J. O' Laughlin: all 4 publications


Abstract

The employer entered into a collective bargaining agreement with the employees as represented by Union A, recognizing Union A as the exclusive bargaining agent and giving it a closed shop. The contract was entered into in September, 1940, and was to last until September, 1942, with a provision for certain modifications before that time. Pending negotiations for modifications, a large number of the members of Union A decided to transfer affiliation to Union B. On September 24, 1941, Union B filed a petition under the Wagner Act to be certified as the sole bargaining agent. Union A resisted the claim on the ground that the collective bargaining agreement of September, 1940, was still in force and had a year yet to run.

Held, this closed-shop contract is for a reasonable duration and is a bar to the present proceedings for certification. In re Owens-Illinois Pacific Coast Co., 36 N. L. R. B. 990 (1941).

Chat with this journal article using AI

Ask CiteLaw's AI Navigator anything about this journal article, verify citations, and research related authorities. Sign up for CiteLaw free today to get started.