Knick and the Elephant in the Courtroom: Who Cares Least About Property Rights?

Radford, R. S.

Journal: Texas A&M Journal of Property Law

Volume: 7

First Page: 577

Year: 2021

Bluebook Citation: 7 TEX. A & M J. PROP. L. 577 (2021)

Author: R. S. Radford: all 6 publications


Abstract

In Knick v. Township of Scott, the Supreme Court corrected one of the most egregious and inexplicable blunders of its 230-year history. For more than three decades, plaintiffs who alleged a violation of the Takings Clause by state or local governments were barred from suing for compensation in federal court. The source of this prohibition was Justice Blackmun’s 1985 opinion in Williamson County Regional Planning Commission v. Hamilton Bank of Johnson City—a decision that most scholars and practitioners believe rested on a fundamental misunderstanding of both constitutional text and legal procedure.

Chat with this journal article using AI

Ask CiteLaw's AI Navigator anything about this journal article, verify citations, and research related authorities. Sign up for CiteLaw free today to get started.