King v. Burwell: Where Were the Tax Professors?

Grewal, Andy S.

Journal: Pepperdine Law Review

Volume: 2015

First Page: 48

Year: 2015

Bluebook Citation: 2015 PEPP. L. REV. 48 (2015)

Author: Andy S. Grewal: all 3 publications


Abstract

King v. Burwell drew unusually wide attention for a tax case. Members of the public, the mainstream media, health care professionals, Washington think tanks, and constitutional, administrative, and health law professors, to name a few groups, all debated the merits of the challengers’ arguments. Everyone, it seems, had something to say about the case — except tax professors. This contribution to Pepperdine Law Review’s Tax Law Symposium explores three potential reasons for the tax professoriate’s reticence.

It concludes that none of those reasons withstand scrutiny, and going forward, tax professors should play a more active role in cases like this.

Chat with this journal article using AI

Ask CiteLaw's AI Navigator anything about this journal article, verify citations, and research related authorities. Sign up for CiteLaw free today to get started.