Justice As Fair Division

Bartrum, Ian, Nyman, Kathryn & Otto, Peter

Journal: Pepperdine Law Review

Volume: 45

First Page: 531

Year: 2018

Bluebook Citation: 45 PEPP. L. REV. 531 (2018)

Author: Ian C. Bartrum: all 19 publications


Abstract

The current hyperpoliticization of the Court grows out of a feedback loop between politicized appointments and politicized decision-making. This Article suggests a change in the internal procedures by which the Court hears and decides particular cases. A three-Justice panel hears and decides each case. Appeal to an en banc sitting of the entire Court would require a unanimous vote of all non-recused Justices.

This Article explores several possible approaches in selecting the three-Justice panel. This Article proposes that applying a fair division scheme to the Court’s decision-making process might act to reverse this loop and work to depoliticize the Court over time.

Chat with this journal article using AI

Ask CiteLaw's AI Navigator anything about this journal article, verify citations, and research related authorities. Sign up for CiteLaw free today to get started.