Judicial Disqualification and Recusal in Criminal Cases

Wilkinson, Edward L.

Journal: St. Mary's Journal on Legal Malpractice & Ethics

Volume: 6

First Page: 76

Year: 2016

Bluebook Citation: 6 ST. MARY'S J. LEGAL MAL. & ETHICS 76 (2016)

Author: Edward L. Wilkinson: all 6 publications


Abstract

The United States Supreme Court has recognized circumstances in which the probability of judicial bias requiring disqualification or recusal is “too high to be constitutionally tolerable.” At the same time, the Texas Constitution contains a number of provisions barring a judge from presiding over a case under specific circumstances, while statutes and procedural rules either disqualify a judge or require him or her to be recused. Thus, whether a particular judge may preside over a given criminal case may be questioned under the Due Process Clause, the Texas Constitution, statue, or the rules of procedure. This Article will examine the applicable constitutional, statutory, and procedural rules that determine whether a particular judge may preside over a specific criminal case in Texas.

Chat with this journal article using AI

Ask CiteLaw's AI Navigator anything about this journal article, verify citations, and research related authorities. Sign up for CiteLaw free today to get started.