JUDGMENTS - PROPRIETY OF FINDING THAT A NONPARTY CONDUCTED THE DEFENSE

Mills, David N.

Journal: Michigan Law Review

Volume: 40

First Page: 307

Year: 1941

Bluebook Citation: 40 MICH. L. REV. 307 (1941)

Author: David N. Mills: all 8 publications


Abstract

A patent infringement suit against a distributor was dismissed on the ground that plaintiff's patents were invalid. A finding was incorporated in the judgment that the defense had been "openly and avowedly conducted" by the manufacturer of the article distributed by defendant. Plaintiff objected that the finding "on its face would be a valid estoppel" in case plaintiff later wished to sue the manufacturer in a separate suit. Held, that plaintiff was entitled to have the finding deleted from the judgment since the finding was not necessary to a disposition of the issues between plaintiff and defendant.

Minneapolis- Honeywell Regulator Co. v. Thermoco, Inc., (C. C. A. 2d, 1941) 116 F. (2d) 845.

Chat with this journal article using AI

Ask CiteLaw's AI Navigator anything about this journal article, verify citations, and research related authorities. Sign up for CiteLaw free today to get started.