Is the Privilege of Private Discrimination an Artifact of an Icon?

Dripps, Donald A.

Journal: San Diego Law Review

Volume: 43

First Page: 1063

Year: 2006

Bluebook Citation: 43 SAN DIEGO L. REV. 1063 (2006)

Author: Donald A. Dripps: all 35 publications


Abstract

Most of what Professor Zwolinski says about the three plausible grounds for private discrimination's privileged position seems to me persuasive. I do, however, offer three observations about the prospects of justifying the prevailing distinction. First, as a methodological matter, there are many settled rules and institutions that are, from the standpoint of moral theory, not quite justified by any single normative theory. Second, an attempt to redistribute the goods now distributed by persons exercising the privilege of private discrimination is normatively problematic.

Third, the privilege for private discrimination indeed tends to track a widely-felt sense that autonomy has special value in some spheres of human life.

Chat with this journal article using AI

Ask CiteLaw's AI Navigator anything about this journal article, verify citations, and research related authorities. Sign up for CiteLaw free today to get started.