Is the Federal Reserve Constitutional? An Originalist Argument for Independent Agencies

Chabot, Christine Kexel

Journal: Notre Dame Law Review

Volume: 96

Year: 2020

Bluebook Citation: 96 NOTRE DAME L. REV. (2020)

Author: Christine Kexel Chabot: all 11 publications


Abstract

Originalists have written off the Federal Reserve’s independent monetary policy decisions as an unconstitutional novelty. This Article demonstrates that the independent structure of the Federal Reserve dates back to a Founding-era agency known as the Sinking Fund Commission. Like the Federal Reserve, the Commission conducted open market purchases of U.S. securities with substantial independence from the President. The Commission’s independent structure was proposed by Alexander Hamilton, passed by the First Congress, and signed into law by President George Washington.

Their decisions to create an independent Commission with multiple members to check the President and one another—and to include the Vice President and Chief Justice as Commissioners who could not be replaced or removed by the President—belie the notion that such independence violated the newly minted Constitution. The Sinking Fund Commission establishes that the Federal Reserve’s independent structure has an impeccable originalist provenance and does not violate the Constitution.

Chat with this journal article using AI

Ask CiteLaw's AI Navigator anything about this journal article, verify citations, and research related authorities. Sign up for CiteLaw free today to get started.