Is a Partnership Under the Uniform Partnership Act an Aggregate or an Entity?

Jensen, A. Ladru

Journal: Vanderbilt Law Review

Volume: 16

First Page: 377

Year: 1963

Bluebook Citation: 16 VAND. L. REV. 377 (1963)

Author: Adolph Ladru Jensen: all 6 publications


Citation analytics

How this journal article sits in the citation network, derived from CiteLaw's graph of published opinions.

Cited
3
Citing decisions
3
Courts citing

Citations by decade

1
1
1
1980s1990s2020s

Courts citing this journal article

Del.1
Mass.1
Wis.1
Most recently cited by3
  • 2020United States v. Sanofi Aventis U.S. LLC Del.
  • 1992Grotelueschen ex rel. Doherty v. American Family Mutual Insurance Wis.
  • 1984Community Feed Stores, Inc. v. Director of the Division of Employment Security Mass.

Counts reflect decisions in the CiteLaw corpus and may lag very recent opinions.


Abstract

The conflict in entity versus aggregate views of a partnership is materially lessened in those jurisdictions which have removed the procedural disability of partnerships to be sued in their own names. The advantages secured by having a procedural statute allowing partnerships to be sued in their own names argue strongly for the adoption of such act in all of the states having the Uniform Partnership Act, as is indicated by the foregoing analysis. The recognition of the Internal Revenue laws of partnerships as an aggregate for purposes of income taxation will most surely long continue, even though partnerships may be sued in their own names, because small unincorporated businesses need the economic advantage of a single tax on the income allocated to the members to grant them much needed aid in the competition of the market place.

Chat with this journal article using AI

Ask CiteLaw's AI Navigator anything about this journal article, verify citations, and research related authorities. Sign up for CiteLaw free today to get started.