Irresistible or Irresisted Impulse

Eliasberg, Wladimir G.

Journal: Cleveland State Law Review

Volume: 9

First Page: 447

Year: 1960

Bluebook Citation: 9 CLEV. ST. L. REV. 447 (1960)

Author: Wladimir G. Eliasberg: all 11 publications


Abstract

It is the purpose of this paper to show that the requirements made on psychiatry have not changed in the least since the application of the Durham Rule. It will be shown that now and in the future as before, the demonstration of the development and the dynamics of the mental processes is what the psychiatrist has to offer. Questions of guilt are not in his province. Now as before this latter remains the prerogative and obligation of the finders of fact, not of the experts.

Chat with this journal article using AI

Ask CiteLaw's AI Navigator anything about this journal article, verify citations, and research related authorities. Sign up for CiteLaw free today to get started.