Interpreting Wisconsin Statutes
Suhr, Daniel R.
Citation analytics
How this journal article sits in the citation network, derived from CiteLaw's graph of published opinions.
Frequently CitedTop 18% most-cited · cited by 13 decisions
13
Citing decisions
1
Courts citing
Citations by decade
9
4
2010s2020s
Most recently cited by10
- 2023Wisconsin Justice Initiative, Inc. v. Wisconsin Elections Commission Wis.
- 2023Derrick A. Sanders v. State of Wisconsin Claims Board Wis.
- 2022Friends of Frame Park, U.A. v. City of Waukesha Wis.
- 2021WCRIS v. Janel Heinrich Wis.
- 2019Stuart White v. City of Watertown Wis.
- 2019White v. City of Watertown Wis.
- 2019Kieninger v. Crown Equip. Corp. Wis.
- 2019L. G., By Chippewa Family Servs., Inc. v. Aurora Residential Alternatives, Inc. Wis.
- 2019Christopher Kieninger v. Crown Equipment Corporation Wis.
- 2018The Manitowoc Company, Inc. v. John M. Lanning Wis.
Counts reflect decisions in the CiteLaw corpus and may lag very recent opinions.
Abstract
"The seminal case on statutory interpretation in recent years is State ex rel. Kalal v. Circuit Court for Dane County, 2014 WI 58. . . . In Kalal, the court emphasized the importance of statutory text when it embraced the principle that a court's role is to determine what a statute means rather than determine what the legislature intended." - Wisconsin Supreme Court Justice David Prosser, 2014.