INSURANCE-CONSUMMATION OF THE CONTRACT-DELIVERY OF THE POLICY

Gaskell S. Ed., John J.

Journal: Michigan Law Review

Volume: 49

First Page: 443

Year: 1951

Bluebook Citation: 49 MICH. L. REV. 443 (1951)

Author: John J. Gaskell S Ed: all 4 publications


Abstract

An application for life insurance was accepted, and a policy issued, mailed to, and received by the agent of the insurer. The application provided that the policy would not take effect until "manual" delivery thereof. The agent made several unsuccessful attempts to deliver the policy, but before any physical transmission of the policy, the insured died. The beneficiaries sued to recover the amount of the policy.

The trial court gave judgment for the defendant insurance company. On appeal, held, affirmed. Manual delivery was a valid condition precedent. There having been no manual transmission to the insured, and the plaintiffs having failed to sustain the burden of showing that delivery to the agent of the insurer amounted to delivery to the insured, the policy never became effective.

Smith v. Rio Grande Nat. Life Ins. Co., (Tex. Civ. App. 1950) 227 S.W. (2d) 579.

Chat with this journal article using AI

Ask CiteLaw's AI Navigator anything about this journal article, verify citations, and research related authorities. Sign up for CiteLaw free today to get started.