Insurance and the Limits of Rational Discrimination

Martin Katz

Journal: Yale Law & Policy Review

Volume: 8

First Page: 436

Year: 1990

Bluebook Citation: 8 YALE L. & POL'Y REV. 436 (1990)

Author: Martin J. Katz: all 16 publications


Citation analytics

How this journal article sits in the citation network, derived from CiteLaw's graph of published opinions.

Cited
1
Citing decision
1
Courts citing
Most recently cited by1
  • 2003Weiss v. Suisse S.D.N.Y.

Counts reflect decisions in the CiteLaw corpus and may lag very recent opinions.


Abstract

In recent years, the insurance industry has come under attack for engaging in "discriminatory" practices against minorities. Critics assert that black applicants for insurance are often charged higher rates than white applicants, or are even denied certain kinds of insurance altogether. In response, insurance companies offer the following defense: any difference in rates between racial groups simply reflects the underlying riskiness of the average white and black applicant in society. In other words, insurance companies suggest that they have a perfectly rational reason to discriminate against minorities.

On average, minorities are more expensive to insure.

Chat with this journal article using AI

Ask CiteLaw's AI Navigator anything about this journal article, verify citations, and research related authorities. Sign up for CiteLaw free today to get started.