INJUNCTIONS-POWER OF A COURT TO MODIFY A FINAL PERMANENT, INJUNCTION

Blackmar S.Ed., Charles B.

Journal: Michigan Law Review

Volume: 46

First Page: 241

Year: 1947

Bluebook Citation: 46 MICH. L. REV. 241 (1947)

Author: Charles B. Blackmar S Ed: all 5 publications


Citation analytics

How this journal article sits in the citation network, derived from CiteLaw's graph of published opinions.

Cited
2
Citing decisions
2
Courts citing

Citations by decade

1
1
1960s1970s

Courts citing this journal article

Conn.1
Ohio1
Most recently cited by2
  • 1977State ex rel. City of Dayton v. Kerns Ohio
  • 1969Adams v. Vaill Conn.

Counts reflect decisions in the CiteLaw corpus and may lag very recent opinions.


Abstract

A court which has issued a permanent injunction may, under certain conditions, open and modify or dissolve the injunction even though the decree in the original action has become final. This power is said to be justified by the continuing operation of the injunction, which regulates future conduct as well as determining the rights of the parties as of the date of rendition of the decree. The same proposition can be restated by saying that injunctions are issued to protect existing rights, but provide no immunity against modification of those rights because of later changes in the applicable law or the essential facts.

Chat with this journal article using AI

Ask CiteLaw's AI Navigator anything about this journal article, verify citations, and research related authorities. Sign up for CiteLaw free today to get started.