INJUNCTIONS - DEFAMATION - INJURY TO BUSINESS

Nadeau, Charles E.

Journal: Michigan Law Review

Volume: 36

First Page: 1206

Year: 1938

Bluebook Citation: 36 MICH. L. REV. 1206 (1938)

Author: Charles E. Nadeau: all 7 publications


Abstract

A complaint praying for an injunction alleged that plaintiff, a retail dealer in automobiles, sold defendant an automobile in good condition; that defendant complained of the steering and demanded a replacement of the parts; that upon inspection, the steering apparatus was found to be in good condition and defendant's request was refused; that thereafter defendant carried signs on the car indicating that it was defective and that plaintiff would do nothing about it; and that he did this, knowing that his claims were false, solely for the purpose of injuring plaintiff and to extort money from him. On overruling a demurrer to this complaint and affirming a final decree which awarded an injunction, the court held that the owner of a business which is damaged as a result of a continuing course of malicious misrepresentation is entitled to injunctive relief. Menard v. Houle, (Mass. 1937) II N. E. (2d) 436.

Chat with this journal article using AI

Ask CiteLaw's AI Navigator anything about this journal article, verify citations, and research related authorities. Sign up for CiteLaw free today to get started.