If Religious Liberty Does Not Mean Exemptions, What Might It Mean? The Founders’ Constitutionalism of the Inalienable Rights of Religious Liberty

Munoz, Vincent Phillip

Journal: Notre Dame Law Review

Volume: 91

First Page: 1387

Year: 2016

Bluebook Citation: 91 NOTRE DAME L. REV. 1387 (2016)

Author: Vincent Phillip Munoz: all 3 publications


Abstract

The Article is divided into three Parts. Part I documents the Founders’ shared understanding that religious liberty is a natural right possessed by all individuals. Part II explains what the Founders meant when they labeled aspects of religious liberty an “unalienable” natural right. The inalienable character of the core of religious liberty reveals what the Founders found special about religion.

It also accounts for religion’s special constitutional status, which for the Founders primarily meant specific jurisdictional limits on state sovereignty rather than exemptions. Part III further clarifies the Founders’ constitutionalism of religious freedom by explaining how the Founders understood natural rights to have natural limits. The Founders’ theory of religious liberty included within itself reasonable limits on religious exercise.

Chat with this journal article using AI

Ask CiteLaw's AI Navigator anything about this journal article, verify citations, and research related authorities. Sign up for CiteLaw free today to get started.