<i>Mt. Healthy</i> and Causation-in-Fact: The Court Still Doesn't Get It!

Nahmod, Sheldon

Journal: Mercer Law Review

Volume: 51

Year: 2000

Bluebook Citation: 51 MERCER L. REV. (2000)

Author: Sheldon H. Nahmod: all 19 publications


Abstract

Over fifteen years ago, I argued in a prior edition of my section 1983 treatise that the second burden-shift part of the Mt. Healthy test, articulated by the Supreme Court in 1977, should go only to damages and not to liability. I also argued that this causation-in-fact rule should not be limited to Mt. Healthy-type First Amendment employment cases, but should apply to constitutional damages actions generally and equal protection cases in particular.

I remain convinced that both aspects of this position are normatively sound, even if no longer good law, in light of the Court's end-of-the-millennium decision in Texas v. Lesage. My position is supported by the following: (1) the Court's 1978 procedural due process decision in Carey v. Piphus; (2) the Court's 1995 after-acquired evidence decision in McKennon v. Nashville Banner Publishing Co.; (3) causation-in-fact principles from tort law; and (4) the compensation and deterrence policies underlying section 1983.

Chat with this journal article using AI

Ask CiteLaw's AI Navigator anything about this journal article, verify citations, and research related authorities. Sign up for CiteLaw free today to get started.