<i>Concepcion</i> and Preemption Under the Federal Arbitration Act

Mitchell, Ian D. & Bales, Richard A.

Journal: Arbitration Law Review (2009 - Present)

Volume: 4

First Page: 9

Year: 2012

Bluebook Citation: 4 ARBITRATION L. REV. 9 (2012)

Author: Ian D. Mitchell: all 1 publication


Abstract

The Supreme Court held in AT&T Mobility v. Concepcion that a California law declaring class arbitration waivers unconscionable was preempted because it stood as an "obstacle to the accomplishment and execution of the full purposes and objectives" of the Federal Arbitration Act. The Court's Concepcion decision was necessarily based on implied preemption, because the FAA contains no express preemption clause and because there was no textual conflict between the FAA and the California law. Concepcion

Chat with this journal article using AI

Ask CiteLaw's AI Navigator anything about this journal article, verify citations, and research related authorities. Sign up for CiteLaw free today to get started.