How to Handle the Truth: Avoiding Improper Sentencing Argument in Courts-Martial

The Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces has identified a variety of sentencing arguments as improper. These arguments are improper because they encourage courts-martial to abandon disinterested impartiality or because they ask courts-martial to consider facts or opinions unrelated to the accused’s culpability. This Article catalogs and classifies the improper arguments that violate these principles for use by the JAG Corps.