How Medicalization of Civil Rights Could Disappoint

Allison K. Hoffman, Stanford Law Review & The Stanford Law Review

Journal: Stanford Law Review

Volume: 72

First Page: 1165

Year: 2020

Bluebook Citation: 72 STAN. L. REV. 1165 (2020)

Author: Allison K. Hoffman: all 6 publications


Abstract

Craig Konnoth’s article, Medicalization and the New Civil Rights, shows how medical framing and evidence of physically identifiable and measurable harms have been providing new pathways to vindicate civil rights harms. Longer-term, however, this Response wonders whether medicalization of civil rights might tell a more ambivalent narrative. First, medicalization could produce a sociological narrowing that could eventually limit how we think about justice. Second, and more speculatively, even the utilitarian benefits that medical framing is now producing might diminish as medicalization becomes a new situs for civil rights contests.

Chat with this journal article using AI

Ask CiteLaw's AI Navigator anything about this journal article, verify citations, and research related authorities. Sign up for CiteLaw free today to get started.