How Italian Colors Guts Private Antitrust Enforcement by Replacing it with Ineffective Forms of Arbitration

Elhauge, Einer

Journal: Fordham International Law Journal

Volume: 38

First Page: 771

Year: 2015

Bluebook Citation: 38 FORDHAM INT'L L.J. 771 (2015)

Author: Einer Richard Elhauge: all 12 publications


Abstract

The United States is becoming more like Europe, and not in a good way. For a long time, the central difference between antitrust enforcement in the United States and Europe has been that the United States features not only public enforcement, but a vigorous system of private antitrust enforcement, while in Europe, public agencies have had an effective monopoly on antitrust enforcement. But that difference is on the verge of collapsing. We are achieving a form of convergence; but contrary to expectations, this convergence is not coming from recent European efforts to facilitate private enforcement, which have not yet overcome some serious obstacles on discovery and class actions.

Instead, it is coming from the recent US Supreme Court decision in American Express v. Italian Colors Restaurant, which threatens to gut private antitrust enforcement in the United States by replacing it with ineffective forms of arbitration.

Chat with this journal article using AI

Ask CiteLaw's AI Navigator anything about this journal article, verify citations, and research related authorities. Sign up for CiteLaw free today to get started.