Historical Truth, Narrative Truth, and Expert Testimony

Wesson, Marianne

Journal: Washington Law Review

Volume: 60

First Page: 331

Year: 1985

Bluebook Citation: 60 WASH. L. REV. 331 (1985)

Author: Marianne Wesson: all 11 publications


Citation analytics

How this journal article sits in the citation network, derived from CiteLaw's graph of published opinions.

Cited
2
Citing decisions
2
Courts citing

Citations by decade

1
1
1980s1990s

Courts citing this journal article

Schuylkill Cty. C.P.1
Wash.1
Most recently cited by2
  • 1994Dever-Gorka v. Hosler Schuylkill Cty. C.P.
  • 1986Tyson v. Tyson Wash.

Counts reflect decisions in the CiteLaw corpus and may lag very recent opinions.


Abstract

This article examines studies tending to cast doubt on the existence of any special faculty that enables psychoanalytically trained experts to discern the historical truth. It then illustrates, by examining the events at one trial, the distortions in the trial process that can arise when experts do purport to resolve issues of historical truth. Finally, it suggests some solutions to the problems described.

Chat with this journal article using AI

Ask CiteLaw's AI Navigator anything about this journal article, verify citations, and research related authorities. Sign up for CiteLaw free today to get started.