HIPAA Hypocrisy and the Case for Enforcing Federal Privacy Standards Under State Law

Oates, Daniel J.

Journal: Seattle University Law Review

Volume: 30

First Page: 745

Year: 2007

Bluebook Citation: 30 SEATTLE U. L. REV. 745 (2007)

Author: Daniel J. Oates: all 3 publications


Abstract

Part II of this Comment summarizes the background of the HIPAA statute as an attempted solution to the privacy problem described above, including its legislative history and HHS promulgation of administrative rules. Next, Part III addresses the agency-imposed limitations on the scope of the statute. The Secretary's decision to rely solely on an administrative complaint process, combined with the government's narrow interpretation of the statute granting third parties immunity from penalties, has undermined enforcement of the privacy provision. Accordingly, Part IV discusses previous attempts to circumvent the administrative limitations by creating a private right of action and the reasons these attempts have failed.

Finally, Part V argues for a new approach, utilizing the common law tort of inclusion upon seclusion. This approach incorporates the benefits of a private right of action with the standards of the privacy provisions in the HIPAA statute.

Chat with this journal article using AI

Ask CiteLaw's AI Navigator anything about this journal article, verify citations, and research related authorities. Sign up for CiteLaw free today to get started.