Good Intentions Gone Awry—A Proposal for Fundamental Change in Criminal Sentencing

Bayley, Christopher T.

Journal: Washington Law Review

Volume: 51

First Page: 529

Year: 1976

Bluebook Citation: 51 WASH. L. REV. 529 (1976)

Author: Christopher T. Bayley: all 2 publications


Citation analytics

How this journal article sits in the citation network, derived from CiteLaw's graph of published opinions.

Cited
3
Citing decisions
2
Courts citing

Citations by decade

1
1
1
1980s1990s2000s

Courts citing this journal article

Wash.2
Wash. Ct. App.1
Most recently cited by3
  • 2003State v. Barnes Wash.
  • 1991State v. Barnes Wash.
  • 1984In re the Personal Restraint of Blair Wash. Ct. App.

Counts reflect decisions in the CiteLaw corpus and may lag very recent opinions.


Abstract

This article will discuss the individual treatment model and analyze the fallacies of current sentencing practices and philosophies. Concluding that the treatment model is inappropriate because it fails to consider fundamental principles of justice and the purposes of the criminal law, it will offer an alternative proposal for sentencing that is not dependent on the theory of rehabilitation.

Chat with this journal article using AI

Ask CiteLaw's AI Navigator anything about this journal article, verify citations, and research related authorities. Sign up for CiteLaw free today to get started.